Application examination
Review frameworks, operating-system assumptions, libraries, scheduled work and external interfaces. Identify dependencies on local state or infrastructure features that could block a move to managed hosting.
Review application architecture, code dependencies and release practices. Compare modernization options and document a realistic first phase.
Plan your solution
This assessment examines how an application's structure and delivery process constrain its next stage. Digital Cloud can review selected code, runtime dependencies, data access and deployment evidence with application owners. The result compares credible modernization paths and identifies a small experiment that can reduce the largest technical uncertainty before implementation begins.
Application modernization changes how software is built, delivered or operated to address a business need. Keeping, adapting and rebuilding are different choices with different cost and maintenance consequences.
Review frameworks, operating-system assumptions, libraries, scheduled work and external interfaces. Identify dependencies on local state or infrastructure features that could block a move to managed hosting.
Compare virtual machines, App Service, Container Apps and AKS where relevant. Evaluate required control, compatibility and operational effort; containerization alone does not establish that a distributed design is appropriate.
Inspect build repeatability, automated tests, secrets handling and rollback behavior. Define an initial validation slice with measurable acceptance criteria, rather than estimating a complete rewrite from a superficial inventory.
A long-lived web application could be assessed for managed hosting by first testing its file handling, authentication and background jobs in an isolated validation environment.
The final deliverables, licensing and responsibilities are agreed for your environment before implementation.
Review code ownership, dependencies, interfaces, test coverage and release constraints. SaaS designs also need customer separation, onboarding, billing integration and clear service responsibilities.
We begin with a conversation about the task, the people involved and the systems already in place. Together we identify what a useful result would look like and which dependencies need attention first. The agreed proposal sets the delivery boundaries, responsibilities and acceptance criteria.
| Project phase | What happens |
|---|---|
| 01Establish the baseline | Confirm the systems, evidence and access needed for the review. Record the current configuration and relevant business constraints before drawing conclusions. |
| 02Prioritize findings | Explain findings in terms of impact and practical effort. Separate confirmed issues from assumptions and identify the owner who can validate each recommendation. |
| 03Plan corrective action | Agree on a prioritized action plan, identify dependencies and define how improvements will be verified. Changes are implemented only within the agreed scope and authorization. |
Useful evidence depends on scope. Architecture and runtime analysis can start without code, but reliable estimates for code changes require appropriate repository and build information.
The starting environment, integrations, user groups and agreed outputs determine the effort. We confirm scope and commercial terms before work begins. Software licenses, infrastructure consumption and ongoing support may be separate items.
The proposal identifies the deliverables: these may include findings, a prioritized roadmap, a tested configuration, a prototype, documentation or training. We agree what is included and how completion will be assessed.
We review the actual applications, data sources and access requirements before recommending an integration. Dependencies and compatibility limits are recorded so the delivery plan reflects your environment.
You can use the findings to guide your own team or discuss a follow-on phase. Any maintenance, monitoring or support includes separately agreed service hours, responsibilities and response targets.